Contract Lifecycle Automation at Scale

The full implementation spanned approximately four months with iterative releases. The core SharePoint platform and approval workflows shipped in Phase 2 (weeks 5–10), with AI clause suggestions, COI tracking, and Power BI dashboards following in Phases 3–4.

Generic CLM tools assume standard contract structures and require heavy configuration to reflect commercial real estate nuances like multi-entity fee allocations, entity-specific routing, and COI tracking per vendor. CAMP was built around the client's actual template library, approval hierarchy, and tenant data model — and runs entirely inside their existing Microsoft 365 tenant with no extra licensing or data egress.

When a contract spans multiple legal entities, CAMP applies configurable business rules to allocate fees by percentage or fixed amount. Entity-specific workflow branches route for entity-level approvals, and consolidated Power BI reports roll up performance across all entities with drill-down capability.

Azure OpenAI analyzes contract context — property type, tenant category, lease terms — and recommends relevant clauses from the organization's normalized library. Legal reviews suggestions in-line, accepts or modifies, and every final clause is linked back to the approved library version with a full audit trail.

Yes. CAMP's data model supports integration via Power Automate connectors and custom APIs. The implementation feeds executed contract data to the client's ERP for billing automation and financial close processes.